Bugs of the Unexamined Life

I have a worm gnawing at my intestines. It happens to me a lot here. It reminds me that when I came, I had to start using a belt for the first time in my life. I have a Uruguayan belt that I bought at Lazarus in Westerville, OH. It doesn’t have holes punched in it because it is sort of woven out of the leather strips. So you put the catch through at any point you wish. When I started wearing a belt here, I made a mark from frequent usage, but now I don’t use the mark as I have to draw the thing tighter. Part of it is living at this altitude and not having a car, but part of it is from time to time some alien organism lost in the labyrinth of my bowels and finding no compassion.

* * *
Got a talkative taxi driver. He’d been to Manhattan, Albany, Las Vegas, Tucson and El Paso. Why didn’t he stay? He likes it better here. At one point, he went out and built a wooden house on top of a mountain and farmed onions and potatoes in Villa de Leiva. Interesting, isn’t it? What is he doing driving a taxi? Knows this place like the back of his hand too.

* * *
Here’s an oddity. There’s this foreigner selling minutes (phone calls that they charge you 200 COPs a minute) downtown. When people act like human phone booths they call out “Llama’as, llama’as, llama’as,” without ever pronouncing the D and with a certain rhythm. But the foreigner can’t figure it out and says “LlamaDas, llamaDas, llamaDas,” without understanding that the value of that D changes in pronunciation, especially here. He’s got a different rhythm to it all, which is the weirdest part. Besides, he looks like a sulky gringo, too lean and tall to be a son of this soil. So at night I was passing this phenomenon and suddenly I saw some crazy, female tramp squatting, hiding behind a light post, and calling out “Hours, hours, hours!” in Spanish (horas). Cognitive dissonance.

She was making fun of the gringo—I wonder if he wasn’t on some kind of sociological research; she was definitely a few fries short—but the mind, taking all of this in, wanted to find the congruent contrast. Hours and Calls (llamadas), don’t correspond, and it was the brain lurch caused by the mind groping for the missing word behind the mocking lunatic’s word choice—minutes—that sent the whole thing into the twilight zone.

Assorted Quotations

Thanks for the comments, I appreciate your concern, but let’s face it, revisionist history to gain an advantage needs to be challenged and corrected such as Pastor Monte has.

Good old pastor Monte, whatever it is he has.

Shouldn’t that be disconcerting since we are talking about a highly trained seminary president who does not under grid his polemic for embracing the evangelicals with Scripture, but instead has resorted to revisionist history and as another contributor posted above, “using good men’s foibles, mistakes, etc. to advance a position [which]* is exactly what the Neo-Evangelicals did to sell their ideas?”

In Defense of What’s Left of the Mess

Obviously not highly trained.

___________________
*I love the correction.

“Ain’t that wrong there?” sez the Devil. “Put in a ‘which’ in brackets to clarify.”

So he did, and it lookt mighty fancy, accurate and educated.

“Why’d you tell him that?” sez the frog to the Devil afterward.

“It kind of under grids the whole strategy that we hereby see as going on as the polemic embracing nutjob theologizers with Scripture and quotations from the lord’s anointed boyz.”

And the frog, he croak grim-like.

Events

I have a Sunday school lesson. Luke 6:27-36, and lets hope its clearer than 20-26 was.

I have a sermon for Reformation Sunday, with Luther, the five Sola’s and even a criticism of BDAG in it (look up klhtois in the 3rd ed. and wonder over the definition while perusing the support offered). I Corinthinans 1:17-31, with Ax 17:10-11 before and then Genesis 28:16 in conclusion (not sure whether to thank CP or NW).

Now some writing.

Tomorrow I can relax while I administer an exam (more writing, I ween—when one is trapped ideas come), and then in the evening we’re attending the graduation exercises for the Marrow of Theology program the Reformed Baptists in Easley, N.C. have been aiding here.

Sunday will be a weary day, and long because we’re having baptisms in the evening.

On Monday, the festival of All Saints and a holiday, I’ll treat myself to a novel.

twitter

I think part of the reason people go for twitter is that it provides what our cast off forms used to provide for us. And the arbitrariness of it, the imposition is what they really want. Remember Chesterton. We all desire fairyland.

Everyday Bogota

“Yesterday rain and today the sun,” he observed.

“Yesterday torrents and darkness, and today glad trees in the wind,” she replied.

“Tropical light on tropical trees, and the breeze all cool.”

“I went a long way walking,
past dogs and owners,
past children and parents,
past drinkers and beggars,
past hedges all climbed over by the grass and puddled ruts in the road,
past loafing workmen and working tramps,
brick walls like castles and slopes all shaggy with long grass.”

“Large clouds in a blue sky and on earth the feckless vegetation the hail will hammer again this afternoon, do not doubt it.”

And in this way they realized the rainy season.

Lines at the End of the Day

Bosch covered Borges in the darkness in the bus
Rain on a courtyard where rulers of countries have smoked at indifferent skies
Hail on the plexiglass, gushing waterspouts, a wave in the library and all those stairs
The damp smell on the bus of Bogota when it’s torrential

All afternoon I laminated
The fireplace which should have been lit was lined with newspapers
The blocked spout for the hot milk
Hot milk mingling with the coffee in a cup
Double-cream cheese through the darkness, the renewing rain

A greek morning with coffee
Lunch and green tea, dozing to C.S. Lewis
And with the afternoon’s empanada the odd accents of Americans
after all these English, Scottish, Irish and Australian voices
The oldest thousand peso bill in existence—like a piece of cloth
Lights and human, colonial dimensions. Dim lights mostly
The sounds of water

Realizations of the Unexamined Life

When I lived in Minnesota I would be filled with great longings to depart in the spring. And in the spring we would travel. Eventually, the anchor line gave and we came to Colombia.

Now, when the best part of the year there comes around here, I begin to remember. I begin to remember the gradual and incremental cold that deepened and deepened. I took great joy in it. Great joy in Christmas trees and indoor lights, candles and the indoor of winter . . . baths—I haven’t had a bath since sometime in January.

I love the changing of the trees, their melancholy loss, the increasing bleakness and the notorious wind. I miss the chilly, withered reeds, and the supplicating branches against wan skies of forlorn clouds. I miss the seedy parts of the Minneapolis skyways, the wind-blown doors and trailing plumes of steam. The striations of the snow I miss, and the full moon seen when emerging from the Institute of Arts.

Never mind the chili dogs, the mounds of fries, the plentiful breakfasts and restaurants with space in them. We don’t get saurkraut a lot down here, nor cream soda, Dr. Pepper or root beer. No real Chinese food like in the USA. The pizza, if you want really good pizza, costs the same or more as there, which means it is priced astronomically for here.

I miss the wide roads, driving and especially acceleration. I miss winding in a dark car quickly, the temperature controls, speed and Bach combined, a passacaglia while outmaneuvering some slow dolt with a liberal bumper sticker, or a Jesus fish. I miss the great buildings of Minneapolis, so massive, so warm in winter, so full of cheer and books and restaurants. I miss the bitter walk along the streets from restaurant to book store. I miss the paperbacks abundant.

But you know what? If I left Bogota I’d miss it too, and awfully. The more I move, the more I realize that in this world I have no abiding city, and I hope it all adds up to a keener longer for my long home, a satisfactory, eternal dwelling place with all the light of God.

I can honestly say I miss California, and I was only there a week. I miss Mexico City when I get down to thinking about it, and I do it pretty often. I miss Ohio, especially its winters and its springs. I miss Texas with its wide ways of life, its wire fences and ugly bungalows; I miss the squirrels and the palms, the sand and seashells of Florida. All this stuff I love and long for. I bet if I wanted to, I could even miss Washington D.C. and I aint even been there for more than 10 hours altogether.

I yearn still for the North Atlantic, for cold waters, cold spray, cold wind and cliffs and grass. I miss the sight of its sea-fowl, of narrow houses set on hills. I don’t know exactly how that longing got in there, but it exists still today and reading Beowulf doesn’t mitigate it. It still bothers me that when the world is all made new there will be no sea, but then I remember that I am made for that place and secretly long for it. I know and know not what I long for. But the longing is deep in me, and constant.

It is a strange nostalgia, because I find that the more I move in this world, the more I wait upon the surface of this terrestrial ball and find things to love, the more I am for another.

Long Story

So back in August I called Telmex to have them switch my service to the new place.

First person I called at Telmex: “Would that be apartment 401 in interior one or two?”

A building made out of two towers joined together has two interiors. It was a good question because at that time I wasn’t sure. So I said I’d call back.

Second person I called at Telmex: “No sir, that address doesn’t exist. We have no record of that building.”

How do you deal with such a person? Hang up and call again, otherwise you just go around and around and it is a matter of pride for them never to admit a mistake.

Third person I called at Telmex: “I can do it, sir, just hold the line.”

Unfortunately, it was the Telmex landline and so of course the call got cut off.

Fourth person I called at Telmex: “Sorry sir, but that address isn’t in our system.”

Me: “Well, can you send somebody out to the address to confirm that it exists and at the same time have him install the cable and everything? Wait a minute . . .”

My cell phone was ringing, and it turned out to be the guy from the third call: “I’ve got it all set, sir.”

I hung up on person #4.

I was pleased and it was done right quick; apparently they really did know of the existence of the building, even at Telmex.

A few days ago I wanted to make a phone call on the neglected Telmex landline. Let us just say that compared with other people, I never use phones—it’s just you have to have them, though I’m reconsidering that now. When I tried to dial I got a message from Telmex telling me I should pay or they were going to cut off my service, which was odd since I hadn’t got a bill. I checked with they guard who mans the door and the individual boxes for when things randomly arrive: nothing. Then I realized that the idiots at Telmex were still sending bills to the other address all the while my service came to the new place.

Ah, guy #4 . . . !

Good luck finding any useful information on the Telmex website. My bank’s website is better and my bank’s website behaves like it has not been updated since 1995. But I couldn’t pay that way because my bank has a limit on how much one pays via internet and you can only adjust it in the branch where your account is located.

I am still not sure why they have that kind of deal with the branches, except that it is like everything else, they nickel & dime you for every possible thing or just organize it badly because they can’t be bothered to pay to much attention to customers. Or incompetence. It reminds me of what they’re saying now about the mayor: he’s either corrupt or incompetent; there’s a lot of corruption down here, but none of us really think that is our mayor’s problem. One almost feels, about the banks now, that they think they’re doing you a favor stowing your money for you in a safe place.

Well, anyway, I go downtown to the extremely ill-located branch in which my work opened an account for me (if it weren’t such a hassle to open my own account I’d do it; my work just sent them a paper and after three months and five or six photocopies of this or that I had an account, which was all relatively painless). There I talk to a formerly helpful guy who set me up with the online services. Only this time he was not helpful. “No, you can’t change the limits every month [it had been at least three]. I can’t change that for you now.” Then he launches into a speech I did not listen to about the customer’s safety, and why they have limits [in all the years I have done online banking I’ve never before run into a limit, or been lectured by an employee in a bank] blah, blah, blah.

He was quite severe also. And what is more, I smirked during the pointless spiel and then for the last time asked, “So you’re not going to help me adjust the limit on my Telmex payment?”

“No.”

So I walked out.

Where this saga goes next, I am not sure. I had a friend ask me today, “What keeps you in this country?”

I though about that as I found out upon ordering the combo of the day in Rodeo that it came with no fries, no fried yucca, nothing but the hamburger and drink. “This is the combo of the day?” “Yes sir.” “It doesn’t come with fries or anything?” “No sir.” “Ok . . .”

I have an answer to my friend’s question: it’s the stories. I was working on one today while my student was narrowly missing failing his final test for level 5. I’m pleased, and I think it’s the story. It’s really good. And besides, the Colombian way of doing things is much like the people accepting and rejecting Science Fiction and Fantasy stories. It’s all good practice.

And Telmex? I’ve half a mind to chuck them and get a cheaper internet provider. The thing I have to weigh is: do I really want to deal with the bank guy again, having him set me up for online payments to another provider? Because I know the service Telmex gives is the same abysmal service everybody here delivers. You don’t get anywhere by changing to another company: you have to change countries for that, or know a politician other than the mayor. But when I think of looking that bank clerk in the eye and telling him slowly to set the limit at the outrageous sum of five hundred thousand pesos . . . it’s tempting.

Treasures of the Unexamined Life

I have two book cases nowadays, but on them stuff of so much distilled worth that I don’t think I can ever be done with these few books. I think Epstein was right about 300 being the number. I’m using the public/private, in other words general library, of course, in order to dedicate myself to the mastery of an exclusive few in my own library.

I also purchase from time to time. What was my surprise yesterday in an ambulatory flea market where there never lack used book booths when I found Davidson’s Analytical Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon in nice shape. When I get my BDAG this Sunday I’ll be almost complete, and the Davidson didn’t cost me the close to $200 I’m afraid the real Spanish-Hebrew thing is going to cost when that day comes. An Analytical is necessary for me still in Hebrew, but it isn’t enough.

We get nice prints that are from time to time sold at the library. Printed in Italy—home of the really fine printers, I suppose. Well-done and not so expensive anyway. I got a Van Gogh. We got it framed and I’m really pleased. It is one of the great things about Bogota that they still don’t shop for everything on the internet. You have the moment of finding the object by chance, weighing the circumstance and the cost, deciding, and then the satisfaction afterward.

Meditation

Lo peor de ser derrotado por la estupidez de la otra gente es el sentido ineludible que has contribuido a la victoria de la estupidez en general, y el pesar de saber que el mundo ya esta colmado de estupideces.

Meditation inspired by events influenced for the worse by the idiots that run Telmex (I have to quit using their services, its just we doubt the competition is more competent), and influenced toward expression, of course, by reading Borges. If I said it in English I’d miss out on the adjectives: ineludible and colmado, and the sound of stupid and its derivatives in Spanish is a bit more mordant, though it’s not bad still:

The wost thing about being defeated by the stupidity of others is the inescapable sense of having contributed to a victory of stupidity in general, especially knowing that the world has enough of it already.

Fill Thou My Life

Horatius Bonar is a quiet sort of poet. He’s never given me much of the old thrill, but he’s a good example of what the quiet persistence yields. We seek light at the end of a poem, and in this poem we receive it.

The word “praise” is so well-worn one feels it is like a pair of old jeans, all the color washed out and so threadbare in so many places only the vulgar and indecent would want to use it. What Bonar does with the word “praise” in this poem is restore its glory. Such restoration is a needed function with the state of religion being what it is today, and language.

It starts slowly, but the last stanza is mighty, and that is partly what I mean by the example of what the quiet persistence yields.

Fill thou my life, O Lord my God,
in every part with praise,
that my whole being may proclaim
thy being and thy ways.

Not for the lip of praise alone,
nor e’en the praising heart
I ask, but for a life made up
of praise in every part!

Praise in the common things of life,
its goings our and in;
praise in each duty and deed,
however small and mean.

Fill every part of me with praise;
let all my being speak
of thee and of thy love, O Lord,
poor though I be, and weak.

So shalt thou, Lord, from me, e’en me,
receive the glory due;
and so shall I begin on earth
the song forever new.

So shall each fear, each fret, each care
be turned into a song,
and every winding of the way
the echo shall prolong;

So shall no part of day or night
from sacredness be free;
but all my life, in every step
be fellowship with thee.

Perseverance

I am grateful for the encouragement of those who from time to time encourage. Perseverance is vital, as this list of originally rejected and some of them pretty good science fiction/fantasy works shows. Dune gave me the most encouragement. I doubt I could read it today, though I should try, but what it conjures up is always wonderful. I am glad it got printed.

I’m still working on things.

A Few Days Later

I’ve finished the Dawson. Every paragraph in Dawson counts and has to be read carefully. If I don’t, I miss what’s happening and it’s just another book. I have been thinking I should go back to Lukacs after Dawson because he’s the same way, and I need the insights. One of the perils of our age and the reason studies like those Dawson makes are overlooked is specialization. We need to know the specialists, to understand what they bring to us, their value, and how to receive what they offer, how to evaluate it. Synthesizers like Dawson and Lukacs are harder to find and are a greater need nowadays.

It makes me think I need to order great waves of books. I need to order in authors and then they come ashore and fill up my bookshelves again. I’ve been taking on another author in a more definitive way, a synthesizer as well: Borges. After the lectures on poetry and the Autobiography, I’m into a biography and learning what to expect, which way he gravitated. His great childhood memory was of his father’s library, his fear was of mirrors, and his love was literature: English literature in particular and most particularly the old Anglo Saxon stuff.

This Craft of Verse

Borges once gave the Norton lectures at Harvard and he did it in English. You can get the book. Every chapter is full of wit and insight, even the one whose conclusions about history are a bit sketchy.

Let me put it this way, if your love for poetry is in the least serious and you do not give yourself the pleasure of reading this book, then you are nothing but a divided camel poised at the wrong end of an elephant waiting for the weighty matter to hit you.

Worth Reading

Very worth reading, it seems to me. A little six-page piece in the NYT Magazine about Arvo Pärt. Contains insights. Has a picture of the contemporary composer looking much like a contemporary composer.

Scapegoattery

“Pou,” sez the devil, “what’s all this about the camels?”

“It’s only a manner of speaking,” sez Pou.

“So you got one camel nosing into the tent, that being the Neo-evangelical camel, and then you have a split camel on the other hand. I presume,” continues the devil, “that now I’m left with only half a camel. It also looks like the half I got is holding the elephant’s tail.”

“I didn’t say nothing about no elephant,” sez Pou.

“There’s talk about an elephant and that my boys are holding its tail.”

“Don’t see me holding no elephant’s tail,” sez Pou.

“Reckon maybe you better lay off the metaphors for a while, Pou,” sez the devil all stern. “You know what elephants eat?”

“No.”

“Straw, that’s what. They eat straw in the circus, I seen it. Ain’t you been talking about straws?”

“I meant the kind you drink through,” sez Pou, lying.

“Don’t try that approach on me,” sez the devil.

“Aw,” sez Pou, but he keep quiet.

“I reckon you know what happens after the last straw is all digested, don’t you, Pou?”

Pou scowls.

“Jest what I need,” sez the devil, “another spider web to get all spun up in. You just maybe better stick to your book for now, hear? Jest what I would need right now was for someone to figgure out some vast conspiracy in which all the real fundamentalists are just you working overtime on the internet. I can hear it now: There never was any movement, it was all Pou. I have half a mind to turn you into a goat . . . but not that kind!”

And with that the devil puffs out of Chicago and heads for the other place.

The Break Is on

The break, apparently, is on, and it seems Lou is trying to drive somewhere and it isn’t working. Fine.

But what is happening here?

IMO only I think the 2009 Danny Sweatt controversy followed by Bauder’s 3 part reaction may have been the proverbial straw that initiated this divide that appears to be growing.

No, not the “IMO” whereby people providing opinions let you know that it is an opinion in case you couldn’t tell. And I’m not too worried with the familiar way of addressing one of the Lord’s anointed boys. I’m wondering about the proverbial straw that initiated this divide that appears to be growing.

The straw?

The camel!

Tough times for our old friend, aren’t they?

I’m wondering if even the Chron of Fundamentarlia can provide a suitable explanation for the condition in which—I think—the nosy camel presently finds itself. Camelology, though new, seems to have unanticipated complexities.

Introduccion a la literatura inglesa, by J. L. Borges

Introduccion a la literatura inglesa, by J. L. Borges is an extraordinary work.

It is extraordinary for its confidence. One is reminded of the contrast between the scribes of the day and Jesus. Usually bit more understated than our Lord, Borges makes his own way through English literature, sometimes blandly repeating commonplace information, but always with the air of imparting a vital insight—which thing it usually turns out to be.

His style is compressed and brisk, and such a terse, quick movement along the dark subway line of time creates continual flashes of insight. What is extraordinary here is not his brevity, but the positively Aristotelian insight he generates from the approach.

Borges’ learning was enormous, and his concise sentences always gesture at his mastery. Doing an overview of English letters in one hundred pages seems neither wise nor well-informed, but the sureness with which Borges carries it off reassures us of his wisdom and the information employed.

That shows the sure judgment of his style. This is also an extraordinary work for its judgment of the authors. He sides with Johnson on the question of Milton’s Paradise Lost (that everybody feels it is a great work, but not great enough to finish), and then names Sampson Agonistes Milton’s masterpiece—with good reasons, and one is inclined to concede he has made a worthwhile point.

Among the authors Borges dwells on is G.K. Chesterton. I doubt many people would place Chesterton among the top tier of English writers, but it shows how unencumbered by prejudice and unorthodox Borges felt he could be. It may also show the limitations of his exposure (mention Swinbourne and omit Pope?), but it really gives rise not to doubts of Borges’ competence but instead to the reason behind the limitation of space. Borges claims, in his preface, he wants to be representative of each period and stimulate interest. I think he has succeeded admirably, just consider what Chesterton represents.

Borges celebrates Gibbon for his drolleries, practices a bit on Graves [“His curious and attractive volume The White Goddess attributes the origin of all the poetry in the world to the myth of the White Goddess, partially invented by him.”], is penetrating on Joyce, a bit baffled by Eliot and altogether interesting throughout.

One is tempted to think the blind bard of Buenos Aires was winking at his readers from time to time, was on the whole perhaps not always being entirely serious—one gathers he admired Boswell for this a great deal. I remember reading Richard Armour’s works on British and American literature when exposed to the subjects in high school. They were illuminating volumes, and I have no doubt that behind the jokes was a lot of love and insight. A whole lot more in command of English letters now, I find Borges full of that kind of love and insight which results in the sort of sane proportion and sufficient penetration that leaves a lingering memory of order and a piqued interest. Because like Armour, Borges’ attitude—extraordinarily cheerful and still masterful, the briskness seeming all easy while freighted with insight—makes the wisdom of the literary wit shine forth.

A Mild and Healing Ray

For anybody not yet following along, Tozer’s last three posts on his posthumous blog have been illuminating. He speaks first of that essential supernatural element to which he was above all things sensitive:

The flame of the Spirit is also intellectual. Reason, say the theologians, is one of the divine attributes. There need be no incompatibility between the deepest experiences of the Spirit and the highest attainments of the human intellect. It is only required that the Christian intellect be fully surrendered to God, and there need be no limit to its activities beyond those imposed upon it by its own strength and size. How cold and deadly is the unblessed intellect. A superior brain without the saving essence of godliness may turn against the human race and drench the world with blood, or worse, it may loose ideas into the earth that will continue to curse mankind for centuries after it has turned to dust again. But a Spirit-filled mind is a joy to God and a delight to all men of good will. What would the world have missed if it had been deprived of the love-filled mind of a David or a John or an Isaac Watts?

I think we know the answer to that. Our hymnbooks are full of what we wish we had missed, and we increasingly wish there were more of the products of the love-filled mind.

In the next paragraph Tozer begins with something that now seems rare and decidedly antique.

We naturally shy away from superlatives and from comparisons that praise one virtue at the expense of another, yet I wonder whether there is on earth anything as exquisitely lovely as a brilliant mind aglow with the love of God. Such a mind sheds a mild and healing ray that can actually be felt by those who come near it. Virtue goes forth from it and blesses those who merely touch the hem of its garment. One has, for instance, but to read The Celestial Country, by Bernard of Cluny, to understand what I mean. There a sensitive and shining intellect warm with the fire of the in-living Spirit writes with a vast and tender sympathy of those longings for immortality that have dwelt deep in the human breast since the first man kneeled down upon the earth out of whose bosom he came and into whose bosom he must soon return again. For loftiness of concept, for sheer triumph of the Christian spirit over mortality, for ability to rest the soul and raise the mind to rapturous worship its equal is hardly found anywhere in uninspired literature. I submit it as my respectful opinion that this single hymn may have ministered more healing virtue to distressed spirits than all the writings of secular poets and philosophers since the art of writing was invented. No unblessed intellect, however sure its genius, would be remotely capable of producing such a work. One closes the book after reading it with the feeling, yes the solemn conviction, that he has heard the voice of the cherubim and the sound of harpers strumming beside the sea of God.

Notice the correct use of the adjective “unblessed.” When is the last time you heard the adjective “blessed” NOT rendered meaningless by ambiguous usage? And then ask yourself how Tozer is able to apprehend what he does.*

This same feeling of near-inspiration is experienced also in the letters of Samuel Rutherford, in the Te Deum, in many of the hymns of Watts and Wesley, and occasionally in a work of some lesser known saint whose limited gifts may have been for one joyous moment made incandescent by the fire of the indwelling Spirit. The blight of the Pharisee’s heart in olden times was doctrine without love. With the teachings of the Pharisees Christ had little quarrel, but with the pharisaic spirit He carried on unceasing warfare to the end. It was religion that put Christ on the cross, religion without the indwelling Spirit. It is no use to deny that Christ was crucified by persons who would today be called fundamentalists. This should prove most disquieting if not downright distressing to us who pride ourselves on our orthodoxy. An unblessed soul filled with the letter of truth may actually be worse off than a pagan kneeling before a fetish. We are safe only when the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, only when our intellects are indwelt by the loving Fire that came at Pentecost. For the Holy Spirit is not a luxury, not something added now and again to produce a deluxe type of Christian once in a generation. No, He is for every child of God a vital necessity, and that He fill and indwell His people is more than a languid hope. It is rather an inescapable imperative.

_________________________
*One thinks of Richard Mitchell’s quotation from Ben Johnson and of what Tozer said above: “Reason, say the theologians, is one of the divine attributes.”

October

It is for me a precious month, especially here, where we have only a vague memory of the world getting colder, the leaves changing, falling, and then muttering among themselves as they diminish into futile gangs. Where I was once October ushered in November, and November was bleaker and chillier all the while, and the smell of apples and cinnamon came inside, and the doors would bang in the wind, and the seemingly endless cooling of the planet deepened toward deadly January and its bitter nights. And we’d buy a Christmas tree and in the darkness light more lights, and go to downtown Minneapolis and the Institute of Arts, and walk in the cold and see the stark trees and fading rushes and forlorn birds and pale sunrises and sunsets over frozen lakes.

I miss it a lot.

So I have two projects from those days to take me back. O Hallowe’eners! And my story of October (who once was Hans) of the seminary on Plymouth way out in space. I think I have the time. I have the inclination, and the nostalgia too.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 53 other followers