The Worm Ouroboros

The seldom mentioned worm Ouroboros, who never actually makes an appearance and when he works only works offstage, is that fell worm that eats his tail. It is well to notice that the worm is summoned by the enchantments of Glorice XII, king of Witchland, and that the worm is also the insignia of his ring. When one comes to the end of this enigmatic book, one ought to think about the worm Ouroboros, and how he eats this tale.

“It is neither allegory nor fable but a Story to be read for its own sake,” are the first words of the book that meet the reader in the dedication. And what a story! No less a writer than the glorious if neglected James Stephens gives the story in an insightful and enigmatic way away with the first words of his introduction, but you would have to read the book to understand. Then he writes, “An energy such as came on the poets has visited the author of this book, and his dedicatory statement.” He then complains of Eddison’s arrogance in putting us off with his dedicatory statement (strange times, those of the early 20th Century, indeed) but still assures us Eddison has been to strange, fantastic regions and has “supped at the torrent which only the greatest know of.”

He has. What flights of imagination, what whole wonders described with unrelenting detail (it is well to read the descriptions and they reward, as for example the latter end of the descriptions of the food at banquets in Witchland do), what creatures, kings, advisors, generals, witches, queens, conniving wenches, traitors, admirals, shepherds, ardent-hearted lords, wise and foolish, battles, stratagems, dilemmas, enchantments, poetry (curious in itself how he finds contexts for old poetry—Wotton, Carew, Herrick, Donne and even Shakespeare), plains, rivers, castles, chambers, banquets, weapons, oysters, deeds and thoughts and world!

It should fall to someone whose work seems to have been neglected to attempt to rescue another’s work from neglect. It is a strange pleasure, however, which attends neglected works. The famous works we may have read when we were too young, or were pretenders intruding in things too mighty for us, or worst of all were forced to read in the discipline of duty. Such reading can be salvaged later, and such works can be appreciated, but it is often at the expense of the happy memory of early love. The pleasure of neglected works is their discovery, our stumbling upon them and without anticipation discovering for ourselves a wonder, a secret enchanted glade, a work of beauty in an attic, a ruin, or in the dust and labyrinth of a true bookstore.

The first strange thing of Eddison’s strange world, is the most wonderful strange and familiar thing of all: his language. He has made a book in which these sentences can live again and rejoice the human heart:

The rain fell gentlier.

[Worth writing a whole book to say!]

“Very prettily conceived, upon my soul,” said Brandoch Daha. “Might I advise thee, thou’dst best not talk to Juss i’ this manner. Not now, I mean, while his mind’s so bent on matters of weight and moment. Nor I should not say it to my sister Mevrian. Women will oft-times take in sad earnest such a conceit, though it be but talk and discourse. With me ’tis otherwise. I am something of a philosopher myself, and thy jest ambleth with my humour very pleasantly.”

And let me not neglect the epistolary glories:

Heare was bifaln an horable great murtheringe battell where Thy Servaunte dyd oppresse and over-throwe with mitch dexteritee those Daemons, makynge of them so bluddie and creuell a slawghter as hathe not been sene afore not once nor twice in mans memorye, and blythely I tel you of Vizze theyr cheefe capitaine kild and ded of strips taken at Crosby felde.

If you have not developed an ease with reading such English, you are missing much and ought to make the effort, for when it goeth apace and old Eddison spins swiftly, why then it shimmereth as ‘t were a thread spun out of glory.

The language makes the world possible, and it makes the high, puissant Lords of Demonland and their awful enemies of Witchland possible. It is the medium of such consciousness. With his language Eddison has taken us to look upon that most mysterious of all created regions: the human heart. There is Lord Juss of Demonland, wise and prudent and determined. There is Lord Brandoch Daha of the bold and ardent-hearted, a veritable Richard Cour d’Leon returned, but in his proper place. Truly is Brandoch Daha one of the glories of this book, but to fail to understand the place he fills at the side of Lord Juss, is to fail to understand what Eddison does with Lord Brandoch Daha. Another of the glories of this book is the formidable and fiendish Glorice XII, king of Witchland. He is politic, sorcerous, fierce, calculating and might with all justice be called Fornicator Immensis et Crudelis. And yet the fierce, semi-literate, apoplectic, lecherous, strong and drunken dukes of Witchland who serve Glorice XII have their own grandeur and tragedy. Trewly doth Eddison prepare for the death of the wikked in the minde of those his readers, but the anticipation thereof is never of such a quality as any may predict. Doom arising ever hovers with the troubling but uncertain shape of tempest clouds.

And it is instructive, reflecting on the world of Eddison and the peoples that move on it, to reflect that tales would not be made without the pride and folly of Witchlanders. Here in this book is Romanticism: the longing for glory and for realms distant because they are departed, or strange or just remote, for winning through adversity by exploiting the adversity without becoming that against which one stands, without surrendering any ideals while practically mastering a situation, without succumbing at any point to the enemy but at even the subtlest point defying that which makes them wrong, makes them enemy. Romanticism in all its glory and contradiction. The Romanticism of romance.

The worm Ouroboros eats its tail. The Lords of Demonland stand opposed to the overweening Witchlanders, the imaginations of their hearts, their dastardly ways, their riot and oppression all. And yet, as Eddison shows us, there is nothing that the Lords of Demonland desire more than Witchland. Such, it seems to me, are we readers of romances in so many ways.

Ebenezer

I have removed the poem as I wanted to submit it for publication.

Surfeit & Contentment

Once in a while one gets one’s reading caught up to something respectable. It is not one of those times for me, and they come very seldom. Madly am I reading The Worm Ouroboros and with impatience for the end but all delight along the way. It is the sort of thing one loves to read aloud and that makes for a slower pace.

To spur me on (besides the many other waiting things) I got me from the library another crop of tomes. I need to declare great days of reading, and take no walks, and write only ideas that come to mind and leave them green in notebooks, and wink at this my blog and at all other things and laugh at sleep.

But such reading is less profitable when it does not come as the light upon all other things in life. There is a time to sow the fields, a time to water them with reflection, a time to weed out the weeds with thought, a time to leave the fields for meals and sleep and other chores and pleasures, a time to reap in writing. It seems these seasons come in years of days, sometimes, or years of weeks, and even years of months, but mostly years of days.

The Love Song of J. Lundquist of Minneapolis among Other Observations

Then up and spake the popinjay
That flew abune her head:
“Gae let him in that tirls the pin:
He cometh thee to wed.”

O when he cam` the parlour in,
A woeful man was he!
“And dinna ye ken your lover agen,
Sae well that loveth thee?”

—Lewis Carroll, The Lang Coortin’

What have I seen? What have I not seen!

A couple smooching noisily on the escalator going down; a red shirt emblazoned with a flaming silver tie (I made a point to stare at it). I have seen small people jouncing and large people shuffling; I have seen the jaunty and the frumpy; two eastern Europeans slouching over food and three ramrod southeast Asians talking while simultaneously ignoring each other. I have seen a pregnant woman with downcast eyes and that look of patience; an old guy on the last pages of an enormous Stephen King and a young lady on a bench, her feet up, her legs a triangle, reading and listening to the waters of the fountain echoing endlessly in an empty space. I glanced at a woman who, it seemed to me, had once been beautiful; chubby, bald and eager businessmen ascending escalators too; and have forgotten nothing that I saw.

A palid woman in her middle age, with skirt and ipod; a bearded chap with awkward glasses sweeping and pausing for the crowds to pass to scoop up discarded things. I went by the languid sushi place, the bustling Chinese wok, a warm place where the pizza waited recumbent the devouring mouth, and tacos, Thai, and hemispheric hamburgers along the passages and around the corners.

(AND I TIRESIAS HAVE FORESUFFERED ALL
ENACTED ON THIS SAME DIVAN OR BED;
I WHO HAVE SAT BY THEBES BELOW THE WALL
AND WALKED AMONG THE LOWEST OF THE DEAD.)

I thought it very loud, shouting over all the impressions crowding in, and suffered then an access of emotion that for a second obliterated life around me as the flowing crowd slowed at a constraining door to trickle through. I was behind three Indians—they with the jungle luxuriant in their jet locks, their untamed lustrous hair. I saw scraggly, hairy bums, women with long, sleek hair or the featherage of startled birds, bouncy dark hair and beautiful bald men.

I smelled the flowers there within the skyway, in the quiet dripping flowershop and passed by Mr. Moustache drab and downcast. I saw locked bathroom doors and a midget three-story building huddled in among the rest, with antler satellite dishes like mushrooms on a pink, square hill in the enchanted forest of frozen skyscrapers. I saw white-clad working men pacing casually on strapped on stilts, a black man with long fingers wiping at his head, and I saw large, looping read earrings hanging from an empty space between. I saw the chewing, massive jaws of women with full faces and heroic mouthfuls; I saw a salad eater with white dressing on his bulging maw—I would have punched the glass he faced, had I not lacked the gall. Bearded readers saw I too, haughty, prissy dullards at the till, slack faces under caps with flapping ears, heard silly, electronic conversations, heard the man just out of jail preoccupied with fines, saw an ugly studious girl . . . these I saw, all these I saw.

I need an epithet, I thought, turning when I had reached a mysterious dead end in the skyway dimly lit by the front of a coke machine. I need . . . an epitaph:

And I wonder how they should have been together!
I should have lost a gesture and a pose.
Sometimes these cogitations still amaze
The troubled midnight and the noon’s repose.

Unreal city
I have become a pair of ragged claws
Scuttling across the floors of silent seas.

A Saint Not Often Quoted on this Blog

Charles Spurgeon – Evening, January 26

All they that heard it wondered at those things – Luke 2:18

We must not cease to wonder at the great marvels of our God. It would be very difficult to draw a line between holy wonder and real worship; for when the soul is overwhelmed with the majesty of God’s glory, though it may not express itself in song, or even utter its voice with bowed head in humble prayer, yet it silently adores. Our incarnate God is to be worshipped as “the Wonderful.” That God should consider his fallen creature, man, and instead of sweeping him away with the besom of destruction, should himself undertake to be man’s Redeemer, and to pay his ransom price, is, indeed marvellous! But to each believer redemption is most marvellous as he views it in relation to himself. It is a miracle of grace indeed, that Jesus should forsake the thrones and royalties above, to suffer ignominiously below for you. Let your soul lose itself in wonder, for wonder is in this way a very practical emotion. Holy wonder will lead you to grateful worship and heartfelt thanksgiving. It will cause within you godly watchfulness; you will be afraid to sin against such a love as this. Feeling the presence of the mighty God in the gift of his dear Son, you will put off your shoes from off your feet, because the place whereon you stand is holy ground. You will be moved at the same time to glorious hope. If Jesus has done such marvellous things on your behalf, you will feel that heaven itself is not too great for your expectation. Who can be astonished at anything, when he has once been astonished at the manger and the cross? What is there wonderful left after one has seen the Saviour? Dear reader, it may be that from the quietness and solitariness of your life, you are scarcely able to imitate the shepherds of Bethlehem, who told what they had seen and heard, but you can, at least, fill up the circle of the worshippers before the throne, by wondering at what God has done.

On Reading

The book that informs us without inspiring us may be indispensable to the scientist, the lawyer, the physician, but mere information is not enough for the minister. If knowledge about things constituted learning, the encyclopedia would be all the library one needed for a fruitful ministry. The successful Christian, however, must know God, himself and his fellow men. Such knowledge is not gained by assembling data but by sympathetic contact, by intuition, by meditation, by silence, by inspiration, by prayer and long communion. If therefore recommend reading, not for diversion, nor for information alone, but for communion with great minds. The book that leads the soul out into the sunlight, points upward and bows out is always the best book.
The man who can teach me to teach myself will help me more in the long run than the man who spoon-feeds me and makes me dependent upon him. The teacher’s best service is to make himself unnecessary. The book that serves as a ramp from which my mind can take off is the best book for me. The book that follows me into the pulpit and intrudes itself into my sermon is my enemy and an enemy to my hearers. The book that frees me to think my own inspired thoughts is my friend.

–A.W. Tozer

Glorious Things Are Spoken

I am drunk on Chivalry again. I have been listening to Ivanhoe for the 5th or 7th time and I have been working my way with pleasure for the first through The Worm Ouroboros. Here are two of my favorite passages of many favorite passages so far out of that glorious work:

La Fireez told them how things had gone, and he said, “Occasion gallopeth apace. Upon this bargain do I loose you, that ye come incontinently with me out of Carcë, and seek no revenge to-night upon the Witches.”

Juss said yea to this; and Brandoch Daha laughed, saying, “Prince, I so love thee, I could refuse thee nothing, were it shave half my beard and go in fustian till harvest-time, sleep in my clothes, and discourse pious nothings seven hours a day with my lady’s lap-dog. This night we be utterly thine. An instant only bear with us: this fare shows too good to rest untasted after so much looking on. It were discourteous too to leave it so.” Therewith, their chains being now stricken off, he eat a great slice of turkey and three quails boned and served in jelly, and Juss a dozen plovers’ eggs and a cold partridge. Lord Brandoch Daha said, “I prithee break the egg-shells, Juss, when the meat is out, lest some sorcerer should prick or write thy name thereon, and so mischief thy person.” And pouring out a stoup of wine, he quaffed it off, and filling it again, “Perdition catch me if it be not mine own wine of Krothering! Saw any a carefuller host than King Gorice?” And he pledged Lord Juss in the second cup, saying, “I will drink with thee next in Carcë when the King of Witchland and all the lords thereof are slain.”

Thereafter they took their weapons that lay by on the table, set there to distress their souls and with little expectation they should so take them up again; and glad at heart albeit somewhat stiff of limb they went forth with La Fireez from that banquet hall.

* * *
Then fared Juss to the guest-chamber, where Lord Brandoch Daha lay a-sleeping, and waked him and told him all. Brandoch Daha snuggled him tinder the bedclothes and said, “Let me be and let me sleep yet two hours. Then will I rise and bathe and array myself and eat my morning meal, and thereafter will I take rede with thee and tell thee somewhat for thine advantage. I have not slept in a goose-feather bed and sheets of lawn these many weeks. If thou plague me now, by God, I will incontinently take horse over the Stile to Krothering, and let thee and thine affairs go to the devil.”

What a chap is Brandoch Daha!

RIP, Rumpole

Back when I watched TV, Rumpole of the Bailey was one thing I really enjoyed. English humor is the stuff for me. I did not think ‘she who must be obeyed’ a very funny joke, but ‘Chateau Thames Embankment’ was brilliant.

The chap who came up with Rumpole, John Mortimer, is dead. Here is an obituary in the Times. It is interesting that the chap writing notes that Rumpole actually affected legal practice in England.

Books & Vanity

The book trade is a curious business. Like any trade, you have to know about your wares. The thing about most merchants, however, is that the understanding of their wares does not usually require of them so much as books require of those who sell them. In the book trade one finds a lot of superficiality due to the notion of supply and demand. Missing the inconsequential dust jacket? Then you will get it a lot cheaper than if it had the benighted thing half clinging to it and discoloring the hardcover. Not that I mind about the discolored hardcover, but my point is the aesthetic inconsistency. Got a signed copy? More valuable even though the contents have not appreciably changed. The signature adds nothing and it is very hard for me to appreciate–perhaps there is something wrong with me–why I now have to pay more for a book I want because that blighter, the author, had to scribble in it with his pen. And first editions. Bah, the first edition of the Hobbit is rather bland about Gollum, but see how much something like that will run you. Is there any peculiar reading pleasure involved in a first edition that has been superseded and improved? Improved! Answer: no there is not. The trade subsists on a lot of sentimentality.

And yet . . . there is too much to know, even for the book sellers, even with the internet. I walked out of Maggot & Quinn, an outfit that ought to know what it is about, with what I am pretty sure is a first American edition of Walter de la Mare’s The Veil, (1922) with uncut pages and only $6.99 lighter in the wallet. I suppose there is some pleasure in having something that might be the first edition (the English first was 1921, so that is the basis of my guess), and being the chap to cut the pages, but mostly the reward I find in feeling smug. If there is no demand for a book by Walter de la Mare, even in the first edition, well, that is the advantage of all this supply and demand.

That is the sort of knowledge that is useful to merchants, and sometimes to lovers of books, but often pointless. It is no indication of the value of the book. This, however, is where the real value of the book is hinted at for me: the book is mentioned by C.S. Lewis in his correspondence with Arthur Greeves–a treasure trove, that correspondence, of what is really worthwhile in books and in reading. Not just mentioned, I ought to say, but mentioned as one of the better volumes before WdlM lost the high vision. The book was in his opinion one of the best books by one of the best poets.

The value of the book is in the book itself, and it is not even in that C.S. Lewis prized his poetry except that C.S. Lewis turns out to be, in this case, a reliable judge. And there is no value in it except that you can appreciate it, and that is the depth of understanding that the true bookseller ought to have, actually cannot, and is more than obviously lacking in our day. And it shows the level of appreciation that books are valued the way they are, sadly. But it is not all without advantages: that is how one finds the Hymns of Frederick William Faber for $2 in the 1875 edition or Coventry Patmore’s The Rod, the Root and the Flower in the 1895 edition for $6: booksellers who are wonderfully ignorant (especially the ones at Half-Wit, which is why they pay so little to buy books too). Durability is something, the longer it lasts the more you can read it. Binding and typesetting that are not distracting are something: you want to have the pleasure of not working against things. But the main thing is: will you take the book off the shelf with pleasure and profit from it?

I started thinking about it today when I sold 34 volumes for $34 out of my library. We have been trowing out junk since in June we want to move. The philosophy of pack-rattery that says ‘you never know’ is the one to which I answer, ‘the thing is, you don’t.’ It is a good philosophy if you have a settled place, but no philosophy for a nomad or a pilgrim. My buyer tried to rebuke me for not valuing the books and trying to sell them for what they were worth. I made sure the buyer knew what a steal was hers by pointing out the value of some, but refrained from pointing out which volumes I had gotten absolutely free. Anybody who wants to go to the trouble of selling books is welcome to the profit (especially nowadays, even Loome’s isn’t buying books or I would have bothered to take them in there). I hate thinking, when I move, that I have a lot of junk I never use. Throw it out, I say, who will for a while yet live like a nomad. I would rather write a long post about books than go to the tedious trouble of playing the merchant carefully–though sometimes I refuse to sell at Half-Wit, but that is more on principle: they make offers out of ignorance and scorn and I want to hit them back with a refusal that at least means they have wasted their time perusing and evaluating the books I offer them. In writing and in reading, not buying and selling is where the glory of books lies! There is some glory in buying them–but that is the glory of searching and finding (which is why I seldom buy online: no pleasure in it, no physical proximity to the books and their dust and the enviable chaps who live in garrets and can work in bookstores), and the glory of selling them is proximity, proximity and the conversations which tend to be much about books, but not the exchange.

One day, all of our books will burn gloriously. Many things from books we will no doubt take with us through the conflagration. No first editions though, no dust jackets, nothing of the physical book or any of our libraries. Only the things the words have done inside of us and at the deepest level. That’s no speculation, no ‘you never know.’ It is truth on which to build a mutable library.

Adventures of the Unexamined Life

After the salt I thought I’d get a car wash. Of course, one usually has to wait two weeks after the snow if one really wants the wash to stick. But then, getting a car wash in the winter is like spitting into the arctic wind. And yet one looks at the reliable thing that starts, that bears the cold, that keeps one warm, that conveys one on miles and has endured Wisconsin at least twice and one thinks: Old Nellie (one day it just came to me, the way things do, the way it came to me the ‘98 Cavalier was the Millennium Falcon, that this was Old Nellie: it’s a Cobalt, you see) would enjoy a car wash.

* * *
I gave up on stuffed animals pretty early on. I just could not take the pleading looks, especially from this stuffed cocker spaniel whose ears I used to comb. It was too much, the guilt. I never played with them and they reproached me. So when I was twelve I bit the bullet and got rid of all that sentimental trash, afterwards thinking sad, accusatory thought about my siblings among whom they were distributed, how they never played with their stuffed animals, poor things.

* * *
But you want to get a car wash just to get rid of all the accumulated salt and give Old Nellie a fresh start. And then you drive down a long road following an old guy doing one mile under the speed limit and driving exactly in all the slush. You get around him just in time to notice another person turning onto the road ahead, talking on a phone and therefore going two miles under the speed limit and driving out of the middle of the lane, spurting clouded droplets into the air behind. It is unreasonable to expect the car to stay clean until the end of the drive on which it was taken to be cleaned, you think as you push the button to clean the windshield.

* * *
Nothing lasts, but Burger King is still around. I remarked to the guy behind the counter that I was running out of money—a habit I’ve gotten into of late, peering into my wallet when asked to pay and making some remark about breaking the bank or cleaning me out, etc., ridiculous—and he offered me an application for employment—just kidding. It is a limp joke illustrative of the limp mood. I sat beside a window where I could watch the cars—all of them dirty—nosing through the drive through two feet away. I noticed the meat flavored with greasy smoke and pushed away the fries. I listened to a couple of young gentlemen discussing their sexual predations, their cell-phone liaisons with the not entirely musical lilt of the punctuating and monotonously rhyming uck, uck, uck. An old guy sat behind me and lurched forward every so often in a stalled rhythm as without hurry he brought his head to where the unidentified hamburger hovered low over the table.

* * *
I read this poem:

London through the Glass

The skyline of London unfolded
a fogbound map, the air frayed
as gaslight. On the discarded napkin,
I drew a rotunda—lopsided,

the debased heir of Wren’s
confident scribbles,
of which almost half are left,
churches that rose from the ashes

of the Great Fire. The city
was a low jumble from which their quills
trembled, spires
pointing accusing fingers.

The buildings have grown taller,
their knowledge of God less theological.
Across the river the London Eye
revolved almost imperceptibly,

the eye of opportunity.
Great cities were built
on the commerce of ashes.
We looked into the past and blinked.

—William Logan

And I understood without even trying.

Another World

I hate to remove my attention from the object demanding attention in the absolute hostility of the bitter cold, but the cold never comes to me without coming to me as the hot weather does, with flashes in the memory of the opposite. In summer I dream of falling snow and frozen streets. In winter I often dream of the languor of warm weather, of summer nights so full of sounds which are the rustling of life in all the world. Curious how the seasons intermingle themselves.

The worst part about the cold is the absence of rain, for I love rain. Rain is the glory of the fall and of the spring. And summer is the armpit of the year because in this arid climate it is often rainless. My wife has on her desktop a picture of Shingle Creek, in green and in the rain. It fills me with longing for something far away, like I am filled with longing to travel. Strangely, the picture was taken in, of all the months, July.

hpim1552

A Book Review

James Wood has written a book on fiction that is very interesting and learned. I know very little about him other than that when it comes to literature and fiction, he knows what he is talking about. What I have gathered here and there from readings and mentions is that he might be called, to borrow a term from literature, the nuts.

“‘Sure, the nuts,’ the Boss said.”

Here he is working his way through a book: starting wide and narrowing in, making distinctions, appreciating before evaluating, and finally concluding in a way that can only be described as devastating. There is much to learn in this essay about literature, about the book in question, and about writing–and I don’t mean just an essay.

Note to Self

Get and read The Book of Ebenezer Le Page.

When I speak of such a loss, I am not mourning the loss of the 1950′s “conservative” Leave it to Beaver America. The 1950′s culture James Dobson wants to return to is antichrist. I mourn the loss of Berry’s Old Jack and Edwards’ Ebenezer, and the cultures, and the material and spiritual surroundings which made the existence of such men possible.

—Owen the Ochlophobist

Which Are Crushed before the Moth

Fear came upon me, and trembling, which made all my bones to shake. Then a spirit passed before my face; the hair of my flesh stood up: It stood still, but I could not discern the form thereof: an image was before mine eyes, there was silence, and I heard a voice, saying, Shall mortal man be more just than God? shall a man be more pure than his maker? Behold, he put no trust in his servants; and his angels he charged with folly: How much less in them that dwell in houses of clay, whose foundation is in the dust, which are crushed before the moth? They are destroyed from morning to evening: they perish for ever without any regarding it. Doth not their excellency which is in them go away? they die, even without wisdom.

—Eliphaz the Temanite

The Best of the Cold

But you know what the best part is of these weeks when we go below zero and stay there with a vengeance? Not indoor parking, although that is what it exists for. Not eight miles of skyways through many of which falls the sun and outside of whose warmth it is pleasant to see the snow and the cold. Not the moments walking into a slight but intolerable wind as you venture outside and the astonishing cold impresses on you that it is out to kill you and that the world was not made by a paternalistic liberal. No, the best part of this weather is long underwear.

In our overheated buildings it is often hard to be comfortable in long underwear. But there is something about the drafts, or the consciousness that it is going to get to -20, or perhaps the exhaustion of the tireless machines that are kept busy blowing hot air, something at least which makes for a great deal of satisfaction in knowing that one can sit around wearing many, many clothes, and especially: long underwear.

At the Library

The central branch of the Minneapolis public library used to be ugly, dim and full of secrets. When it became evident that the building was intolerably outdated for the image of its city (after all, it is NOT St. Paul) it was demolished and gradually replaced with a building no longer dim, devoid of secrets, but still reassuringly ugly. When the last Ikea and the spirit of stark functionality go out of vogue, this library will remain as a monument to that spirit until it is no longer tolerable. Then it will be replaced with something ugly in a more fashionable way.

One has to wonder why architects enjoy making buildings so demeaning to the humans for which the buildings exist. It is as if they hated the thought of people polluting the incarnation of their pure and clean designs. I can sit on the third floor looking at the only set of escalators in the building and watch them running empty while people trudge up the stairs to the fourth floor since waiting for the one set of elevators isn’t usually worth it. There is something dysfunctional about functionality, sometimes.

I think it does something to the people who work here too: the inmates. I watch them pass pushing carts laden down with seven or eight magazines, trudging wearily toward the stacks between the unpainted concrete pillars and the bare white ceilings that remind me of nothing so much as of a prison.

There are advantages to functionality sometimes. The chairs are basic but good to sit in. The stacks are made of ugly shelving but the light and air reach them very well—no mysteries in this library. The useless escalators run without interruption, and the stairs must be particularly good to enjoy almost equally uninterrupted traffic. The doors behave the way they ought except that they stand open longer than most unenhanced doors do (it is as if every door were a handicapped door, which is very thoughtful, I suppose). You can do everything you need at the library absolutely without any human contact other than the guard who might shake you down or rummage through your bag.

When you go to the St. Paul central library you enter an old and elegant world (and you realize the building in Minneapolis can not have been whatever is responsible for how the employees are). Here, you think, I will find correspondingly elegant and graceful furnishings for the soul. When you go to the central library in Minneapolis there is some doubt. Will I find here furniture adequate in this Ikea for the soul? Surprisingly you still may.

There is another strange thing about the library: it is the human figure moving through it. There you see it: tousled, bundled, muffled, hooded, bearded, breasted, neat and sloven, shuffling, shambling, striding, dashing in and out and up and down, and of all things there to see it’s still the strangest thing. I saw this great and hooded black guy, powerful and massive, looking like he had just come out of the underworld and was heading across town to rip out somebody’s guts with a hook. And then I noticed that he carried under his arm a fat volume: Harry Potter and the who know’s what. Harry Potter and the Library, perhaps.

Lud-in-the-Mist

I am not surprised at all that Lud-in-the-Mist should be a neglected novel. While the point is certainly a good one, it is made in a rather regrettably forgettable way. It is not my opinion that anything in this novel is properly led up to. At least, when anything arrives it does so in a rather lackluster way. Notice the way I write this paragraph. Mostly, that is how the book is. Not to say that Hope Mirrlees did not have the sparkle of intelligence or the ability to think in dependent clauses, but what one gets strikes one too frequently as mere clevernesses, as effects wasted because they are badly deployed.

It would be interesting for a person of humanity and learning to make a study of the development of fantastic fiction out of the gropings of the 19th Century and its final flowering in the work of J.R.R. Tolkien. For such a person to read Lud-in-the-Mist would be obligatory and probably enjoyable. Whether it was an actual influence on the writers thereafter is of no consequence; it was the expression of something moving in the air, as it were, during the development of the fantastic in literature. I have the feeling and verily believe there is something of the Victorian in the impulse toward fantastic fiction that was finally crystalized in a reaction to the starkness of the winter of Modernity.

It would also be interesting to inquire whether the fantastic requires the plot of a quest in order to achieve its purposes. I say this because Lud-in-the-Mist could really have used something of the sort as an assurance to the reader during the course of the story that the story was indeed moving somewhere. That is not to say that the story has nowhere it wants to go. It has a destination and a certain order, but the flaw lies in requiring too much trust of the reader. Trust ought to be earned. Earning has to go in increments. The incremental earning of the reader’s trust is part of the way a writer builds the anticipation for a good conclusion that a good novel provides. There is not a great deal of what one usually finds in good stories in the way of suspense or even more than mild curiosity drawing one on in Lud-in-the-Mist. What is missing is not in the idea of the story or its destination. What is missing has to do with the structure of things: when they appear, or, if you will, where they appear. The quest would have given the appearance of things a purpose. The novel is not, in the end, sufficiently mysterious.

At least not for me. I think a lot of you will probably like it.

Reading Lud-in-the-Mist I had a strange sense of having encountered something similar before. It started when I read the name of the doctor: Endymion Leer. I do not think I had read the book before, but gradually it dawned on me I had encountered a writer much influenced by this book: James Blaylock. In James Blaylock’s stories—the ones I read—one encountered Jonathan Bing the cheese maker, his stolid hound Ahab, and was taken on rather confusing adventures usually bringing the reluctant hero to a place sinister in a baffling and incongruous way. At least that is what I remember. (I have very pleasant memories of encountering a seaside town in James Blaylock’s first novel which has always stayed with me and I have actually tried to recapture in some stories I have written myself.) I mention this because Lud-in-the-Mist has the same baffling way of wandering although it is not, in the end, sinister. And I believe Blaylock may have borrowed the name Endymion Leer, though it has been close to twenty years since I read him and my recollection may be all bosch.

It is a curious thing, but there is an uneasy relationship between fantastic literature and allegory. It might be a similarity of ends that like same ends of magnets exerts a certain repulsion between them. I say it might be since I am not sure, but it does seem to me that in no other literature is it more evident that the comment made on the world is made, as it were, by other means. Or by the means of other things, or other worlds, if you see what I mean. The difference is that allegory is pretty unabashed in the way it reaches beyond its world into ours. Fantasy is shy of this, and in this consists the possibility of its aspirations toward literature. Now I do not know why my attempts to reflect on Lud-in-the-Mist should prompt this last paragraph, other than that nothing occurs to me to say further about Lud-in-the-Mist.

Well, I will say I think books tend to fail when they aim to make a comment on the world. A comment on the world is too limited a thing for literary aims. Allegory, now, is a sort of throwing of a javelin, and literature, it seems to me, is more of a casting of a net. The virtue of throwing a javelin, when you succeed, is that you really nail the thing you want to hit unambiguously and in a way even fundamentalists can often appreciate.* But the glory of casting a net is that you come up with a certain variety; if it is a comment on the world, it is the sort of comment that comments on the whole nature of the world, if you see what I mean. I think Hope Mirrlees attempted to do the latter by way of the former: she wanted to cast a net but was holding a javelin; which is, unfortunately, not only backwards but also doomed.

*Too gratuitous! I know, but I could not resist. I will make one concession and violate the laws of the best humor. Let me say, for those who are not likely to understand and may take offense, that I only mean it as a joke and that I do not need a list of works of literature fundamentalists have been known to understand or anecdotes of years spent by fundamentalists understanding works of literature in the dark. And let me add, for those whose wits sometimes are inadequate to perceive how my mockeries manage to involve myself, that it is probably not possible for me to exclude myself from the group, even though I do not believe in the idea. A multifarious propinquity has doomed me. Let me also interject, while I’m at it, that when it comes to any statements of allegory, I am so ignorant as not even to deserve an opinion. All I know is, I don’t like they way it works, I think. I am certain about what I say about literature and I think my point about Mirrlees is sound, but there is room for dubiety if you consider some of the means by which I achieve the end. I cannot say that I have not taken such liberties in the past (even though sometimes I have resisted the impulse all the way to the end), and I think it is well for the reader to bear this in mind. I indulge in these frank confessions at this point for the sake of variety. With me you cannot always count on candor, and that is the truth.

Good News

Yokels have better brains.

Thousands of dollars at last prove that natural surroundings are actually more congenial than artificial surroundings.

Directions

My tastes these days seem directed toward Henry James and Joseph Conrad. That is, the impulse of my tastes is and a little of the tasting itself leads me to expect the impulse will develop into a strong taste. What is it, I wonder, makes this the case? Some of it, as with most literature for me, is the growing of a seed planted by T.S. Eliot and encountered long or short ago.

Henry James I have not had the refinement to enjoy in the past. Whether the refinement has caught up to me (it is maturity widens one’s tastes, but in the case of Henry James, that maturity is one tending toward much of refinement—has to be) or I have learned to deceive myself into thinking I begin to understand; one may debate.

One is left with little to talk about after Henry James, I find. One has the thing in the thing itself so entirely it is simply accepted. Perfection, perhaps. But what one is left to talk about after a work is not always and not only a function of the flaws in the work, but a function of the things the work suggests. Either Henry James makes no suggestions or I am still impervious to their subtle power. At least that is my present conclusion. I have begun listening to A Portrait of a Lady three times without finishing. The benefit of that is in becoming used to the pace of things in Henry James. As a result of this I begin to understand the atmosphere, as it were, of the consciousness one enters in the works of art of Henry James. Since then I have successfully completed Washington Square with enough mingled satisfaction and perplexity to draw me further in.

With Henry James goes Joseph Conrad; that is simply a fact. I have made better headway with Conrad in the past, but not intelligent. So now it is time to widen my acquaintance in terms of breadth and, should it be possible, of depth as well.

A Walk

The moon was veiled, a smudge (I do not like that word) of light behind the clouds. Beneath them, more defined I saw the shadow of a bough cast on the vagrant silver smoke out of a chimney.

The cold that bit my ears was cold enough to cause me tears, and outdoors all was solitude.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 53 other followers